Technology sharing

It's worth noting that while Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 both use the Type-C connector and offer a maximum speed of 40Gbps, they differ in certain aspects. For instance, Thunderbolt 4 ports are marked with a Thunderbolt symbol, whereas USB4 ports lack any such marking. Additionally, USB4 comes in two versions: USB4 20 and USB4 40, representing transmission speeds of 20Gbps and 40Gbps, respectively. On September 1, 2022, the USB-IF officially announced the new generation of the data interface specification, USB4 2.0 version, supporting up to 80Gbps data transmission rate. Currently, devices equipped with Apple's M1 and M2 chips, AMD Ryzen 6000 series APUs, and Intel's 11th Gen Tiger Lake H processors support USB4. ... Learn more here https://www.ankmax.com/newsinfo/6997671.html

The widespread adoption of USB4 hinges on leading international chip manufacturers like AMD, Intel, and Apple. Theoretically, any device that supports Thunderbolt 4 can also support USB4. Both Thunderbolt 4 and USB4 are built on the Thunderbolt 3 underlying protocol, offering complementarity and compatibility. In simple terms, Thunderbolt 4 further enhances performance thresholds and expands functionality, meeting USB4 specification requirements, resulting in a better experience for devices supporting Thunderbolt 4. On the other hand, USB4 boasts stronger universality and lower requirements. ... Learn more here https://www.ankmax.com/newsinfo/6997671.html

As the "brain" of USB4 terminal equipment, the importance of the main control chip is self-evident. Currently, according to the categories of USB4 terminal equipment, the main control chips have also differentiated into different types to adapt to terminal applications. The following is an introduction to the USB4 main control chip. ... Learn more here https://www.ankmax.com/newsinfo/6997671.html

  Thunderbolt 5 is Here - Up To 80 Gbps Bandwidth With Existing USB Type-C Ports The last visible line states "[...]N6 test-chip focusing on the new PHY technology is working in [...] showing promising results". The only information that can be gathered by the statement is that the N6 test-chip is a TSMC node. Outside of that, it is unsure what the complete statement shows. Advancing to a Thunderbolt 5 bandwidth seems the most logical step for Intel to move towards, but with only having the information provided, we will have to wait until we can access more information to provide an expert opinion on Intel's move towards PAM-3 technology. Learn more here https://c887487260lfw.scd.wezhan.cn/newsinfo/1774461.html

So, where PAM-4 is twice the bandwidth of NRZ, PAM-3 is in between the two but allows for a much higher bandwidth that PAM-4 needs to utilize exceptions and extra limitations. In essence, this technology will process the variables, not only faster but more efficiently. Learn more here https://c887487260lfw.scd.wezhan.cn/newsinfo/1774461.html

The following line reads "[T]he PHY will be based on novel PAM-3 modulation technology". When talking about PAM-3, or Pulse Amplitude Modulation, we are discussing how 0s and 1s are transmitted, or in this case, a single bit. Right now, PAM-4 and NRZ are the standard, where the number 4 pertains to the number of variances of zeros and ones (00, 01, 10, or 11) being transmitted in NRZ, or a single bit. In PAM-3, zeroes and ones are thought of in negative or positive values—i.e. -1, 0, and +1. The system then combines two PAM-3 modules and transmits the information into 3-bit data signals, where the value 000 is an -1 followed by -1. Learn more here https://c887487260lfw.scd.wezhan.cn/newsinfo/1774461.html

Like most executives, he is documenting part of his trip through social media, namely Twitter. Posting to social media is great for public relations, but is also full of room for error. While visiting one of the Israeli facilities, several photos were taken, and he posted some for Intel fans and users on Twitter. One photo which shows Intel's Next-gen Thunderbolt 5 technology with PAM3 made it to Twitter, along with a few others, but was promptly removed and replaced with only three photos from the visit. Why was the post removed? The photo in question displayed information on a poster at the facility that showcased new technology that was not meant to be released to the public—at least not yet. The subject of the poster states "80G PHY Technology", which is speculated to be the physical layers on an 80 Gbps connection. If this is true, that is currently double the current physical layers, which is 40 Gbps, utilizing Thunderbolt 4. Underneath the header, the first line re...